Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 5:25:21 GMT -5
On other occasions it has been pointed out in “Business Foundations” how attractive this result is to politicians of all parties who are involved with philanthropic organizations to promote their personal interests. Some cases have been reported where those wish to exalt their altruistic, supportive side and even their personal history of helping. Now the one who is visible in the media trial is Josefina Vázquez Mota, who, due to her position as former Secretary of Social Development, knows well the loopholes that exist in the laws that correspond to civil organizations and the provisions established by the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (SHCP) and of course he knows well the Federal Registry of Civil Society Organizations that is in charge of the National Development Institute (Indesol). In recent days it was announced that Vázquez Mota honorarily presides over the organization “Juntos Podemos” (Together We Can), and that due to some triangulations he has received public resources from Mexico that were delivered to other organizations in the United States and finally reached the aforementioned association. The above unleashed a series of doubts and suspicions, not so much because of the large amount, more than 900 million pesos, but also analysts wondering if resources are not being financed for a possible gubernatorial campaign of the former presidential candidate to lead the Mexico state. The suspicions are based on the fact that Juntos Podemos has a representative office in Mexico and apparently at the same address where the PAN offices are located. As appropriate and with all the right that s is being widely promoted and in a few weeks she has spoken about corruption in different youth forums. He raises his flags for the first organization, the migration of infants (for what presided over the Intergral System for the National DIF Family) and with the second, the fight against corruption, this last cause inexplicable when the PAN members even erected a monument to him on Paseo de la Reforma in Mexico City and is known as the “Suavicrema” because of the cookie shape that simulates the construction of… Building? Lamp? Urban ornament? On the other hand, in the last month at least three anti-corruption initiatives have emerged: Zero Impunity, Mexicans against Corruption and MéXXIco against Corruption and the birth of one more is foreseen shortly whose objective is to analyze, detect and report any maneuver of corruption.
Corruption and act accordingly. Just in New Zealand WhatsApp Number the first week, some provisions were announced that the SHCP wants to establish in 2017 supposedly to encourage the culture of donation in Mexico because we enjoy “a generous regime that is not an obstacle” to promote the general public to make donations. The argument turned to the fact that in reality the lack of transparency, accountability and results (which is sometimes confused with social impact) is what discourages the donor, combined with the lack of professionalization of the philanthropic sector. The problem of the provisions of the SHCP provisions has been analyzed in depth and various organizations have undertaken actions to establish a dialogue with legislators and tax authorities who left aside those of the Ministry of Social Development, but it is time to reflect Regarding civil associations that, even though they are not authorized beneficiaries or have Cluni, mobilize resources that are not donations per se but contributions from supporters and the general public. These types of organizations – without registering with Indesol and without being donors – escape any surveillance regarding the origin, management and destination of their resources. Remember, for example, the case of De Antuñano, who has a civil association to give free rein to his taste for filming. This is the case of the memorable Friends of Fox association, which at the time was widely questioned. Those are closer to being self-benefit associations, where supporters can mobilize resources without being accountable to anyone. It is alleged that they are individuals working for purposes established by the association. Paradoxically, for philanthropic organizations that are regulated, there is a widespread idea that they will be able to obtain more resources. Well, this is relative because of the two sources of obtaining money, the request for donations and the generation of own income, the last source is a function of a percentage authorized by the SHCP, exactly one of the few prerogatives that the 2017 opinion desires. expand and that could benefit the sector.
Associations that do not even have the possibility of being formally established before a notary public can work informally very efficiently. Think, for example, of the thousands of condominium neighborhood associations that, when well managed, generate resources for the owners of a property for maintenance work and payment of services. You can also advise self-help associations in neighborhood communities. There are exemplary cases in Milpa Alta that without being donors or having Cluini, they attend to the needs of the neighborhood, have generated jobs, promoted the solidarity economy, established safety networks with nightly neighborhood patrols, fair trade and the preparation of cheaper groceries when purchasing large volumes. They do not break any law, but as one of their members once pointed out in a Fundraising Sources course, having “the deductibility of donations rather hindered them… and the key is the way in which the settlers participate.” In such a way that on the horizon there is a need to promote the philanthropic sector but not by applying more controls or establishing levels of institutionality that the SHCP envisions because they generate gaps for organizations and would undermine the relationship with donors. Rather, the government could promote their work, their activities and the services they offer to encourage the public to help them. But on the other hand, there is a need to observe those civil associations through which deceptive actions can be carried out, maneuvers for political purposes to reverse the electoral laws. look out Citizens working The Chairman of the Board of Directors commented that his attention was drawn to a news item published several days ago indicating and how it can be effectively linked to Corporate Social Responsibility. Even though the investigations are just beginning, the behavior of the Trump Foundation raises alert about the maneuvers that the magnate has carried out in declaring bankruptcy some of his companies in the past, which allowed him to suspend the payment of taxes for several years and divert funds to pay their debts, said the Treasurer of the Board of Directors.
Corruption and act accordingly. Just in New Zealand WhatsApp Number the first week, some provisions were announced that the SHCP wants to establish in 2017 supposedly to encourage the culture of donation in Mexico because we enjoy “a generous regime that is not an obstacle” to promote the general public to make donations. The argument turned to the fact that in reality the lack of transparency, accountability and results (which is sometimes confused with social impact) is what discourages the donor, combined with the lack of professionalization of the philanthropic sector. The problem of the provisions of the SHCP provisions has been analyzed in depth and various organizations have undertaken actions to establish a dialogue with legislators and tax authorities who left aside those of the Ministry of Social Development, but it is time to reflect Regarding civil associations that, even though they are not authorized beneficiaries or have Cluni, mobilize resources that are not donations per se but contributions from supporters and the general public. These types of organizations – without registering with Indesol and without being donors – escape any surveillance regarding the origin, management and destination of their resources. Remember, for example, the case of De Antuñano, who has a civil association to give free rein to his taste for filming. This is the case of the memorable Friends of Fox association, which at the time was widely questioned. Those are closer to being self-benefit associations, where supporters can mobilize resources without being accountable to anyone. It is alleged that they are individuals working for purposes established by the association. Paradoxically, for philanthropic organizations that are regulated, there is a widespread idea that they will be able to obtain more resources. Well, this is relative because of the two sources of obtaining money, the request for donations and the generation of own income, the last source is a function of a percentage authorized by the SHCP, exactly one of the few prerogatives that the 2017 opinion desires. expand and that could benefit the sector.
Associations that do not even have the possibility of being formally established before a notary public can work informally very efficiently. Think, for example, of the thousands of condominium neighborhood associations that, when well managed, generate resources for the owners of a property for maintenance work and payment of services. You can also advise self-help associations in neighborhood communities. There are exemplary cases in Milpa Alta that without being donors or having Cluini, they attend to the needs of the neighborhood, have generated jobs, promoted the solidarity economy, established safety networks with nightly neighborhood patrols, fair trade and the preparation of cheaper groceries when purchasing large volumes. They do not break any law, but as one of their members once pointed out in a Fundraising Sources course, having “the deductibility of donations rather hindered them… and the key is the way in which the settlers participate.” In such a way that on the horizon there is a need to promote the philanthropic sector but not by applying more controls or establishing levels of institutionality that the SHCP envisions because they generate gaps for organizations and would undermine the relationship with donors. Rather, the government could promote their work, their activities and the services they offer to encourage the public to help them. But on the other hand, there is a need to observe those civil associations through which deceptive actions can be carried out, maneuvers for political purposes to reverse the electoral laws. look out Citizens working The Chairman of the Board of Directors commented that his attention was drawn to a news item published several days ago indicating and how it can be effectively linked to Corporate Social Responsibility. Even though the investigations are just beginning, the behavior of the Trump Foundation raises alert about the maneuvers that the magnate has carried out in declaring bankruptcy some of his companies in the past, which allowed him to suspend the payment of taxes for several years and divert funds to pay their debts, said the Treasurer of the Board of Directors.